Avoid the temptation to grade your organization too leniently. Achieving a Capability Level 5 across all domains is incredibly rare, expensive, and usually unnecessary. Most stable enterprises aim for a balanced mix of Levels 2, 3, and 4.
4 Objectives (Management) Anatomy of a "Fixed" 2021 COBIT 2019 Excel Tool
, which was significantly updated in 2021 to support tailoring governance systems and determining target capability levels. Key Assessment Tools & Templates
Even with a fixed and fully optimized Excel spreadsheet, human errors can derail your assessment:
A properly fixed 2021 Excel tool delivers:
Major publications from 2021, such as ISACA's "Building a Maturity Model for COBIT 2019 Based on CMMI" (December 2021), provided the theoretical foundation for creating more accurate assessment schemas. These guides helped practitioners move beyond simple calculations and adopt more sophisticated scoring methods, like weighted averages, to better reflect the complex reality of their organizations.
By using the COBIT 2019 maturity assessment tool XLS 2021, organizations can ensure that their IT governance maturity is assessed accurately and reliably, and that they are well on their way to achieving their business objectives.
This is precisely where the "COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool XLS 2021 Fixed" fits. It is one of the most refined, community‑driven answers to that need.
Standards are documented and understood across the enterprise.
A maturity assessment is a continuous loop. Use the XLS file as a living document, updating scores quarterly or semi-annually as process improvements roll out. Conclusion
| Level | Name | Description | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Incomplete | The process is not implemented or fails to achieve its purpose. ||| | 1 | Performed | The process achieves its purpose through a set of basic activities. || | 2 | Managed | The process is managed, planned, and monitored, and its work products are controlled. | | 3 | Established | The process is well-defined and performed according to a standard process. | | 4 | Predictable | The process is measured quantitatively and operates within defined limits. | | 5 | Optimizing | The process is quantitatively managed and continuously improved to meet targets. |
Fixed the SUMPRODUCT and AVERAGE formulas that previously skewed capability levels.
The central hub of your assessment. It aggregates data from individual process sheets and populates dynamic spider (radar) charts. This provides executives with an immediate visual summary of actual versus target maturity levels. 2. Design Factors Assessment
This is the final report sheet. It aggregates the capability scores from all processes within a focus area to generate an overall . It also provides a visual, color-coded heatmap or radar chart for board-level presentations.